<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Film Web Blog</title>
	<link>http://filmwblog.com</link>
	<description>Just another Film weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Edge Of Heaven</title>
		<link>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/the-edge-of-heaven/</link>
		<comments>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/the-edge-of-heaven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/the-edge-of-heaven/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<P>Writer-director Fatih Akin follows up the lauded Head-On with another ambitious melodrama (part two in his Love, Death And The Devil trilogy). Shuttling between locations in Germany and Turkey, the Babel-esque narrative explores the connections between three families: a septuagenarian Turkish father living in Bremen with his academic son (Baki Davrak); a prostitute who sends money to her political activist daughter (Nurgul Yesilcay) in Istanbul; and a German mother (Fassbinder regular Hanna Schygulla) with a lesbian daughter. Strewn with coincidence and tragedy, The Edge Of Heaven is undeniably schematic in outline. Yet it&#8217;s shot in a precise, contemplative style and acted with clout by the ensemble cast. Akin&#8217;s compassion for the characters is clear, not least in the concluding mood of forgiveness. </P> <P><br /><br />Source: <a href="http://rss.feedsportal.com/c/395/f/5914/s/95b991/story01.htm">The Edge Of Heaven</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/the-edge-of-heaven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Black Remakes Movie History in Be Kind Rewind</title>
		<link>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/jack-black-remakes-movie-history-in-be-kind-rewind/</link>
		<comments>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/jack-black-remakes-movie-history-in-be-kind-rewind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/jack-black-remakes-movie-history-in-be-kind-rewind/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/175574.jpg" />Jack Black stars as Jerry, an accident prone mechanic who gets caught in an electromagnetic field, in the New Line Cinema comedy <em>Be Kind Rewind</em>. Wandering the aisles of the video store where his best friend works, Jerrys magnetized brain causes every single video tape in the small-time neighborhood store to erase itself. The stores owner doesnt believe in DVDs and so the loss of all the video tapes causes an immediate problem. Fortunately, Jerry and Mike (Mos Def) come up with a plan to keep the customers satisfied. They remake the erased films using homemade props and a lot of imagination. <strong>Read On...</strong><br /><br /> <b>More on <em>Be Kind Rewind</em></b><br /> <li><em>Be Kind Rewind</em> Photos</li><br /> <li>Poster for <em>Be Kind Rewind</em></li><br /> <sub>(<em>Photo  New Line Cinema</em>)</sub><br /><br /><br /> <b>Top 10 Films for Weekend Ending 02/17/08 (Estimates)</b><br /> <img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/175575.jpg" /> 1) <i>Jumper</i> - $27,200,000<br /> 2) <i>Step Up 2 The Streets</i> - $19,600,000<br /> 3) <em>The Spiderwick Chronicles</em> - $19,000,000<br /> 4) <i>Fool's Gold</i> - $13,000,000<br /> 5) <i>Definitely, Maybe</i> - $9,600,000<br /> 6) <i>Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins</i> - $8,800,000<br /> 7) <i>Juno</i> - $4,600,000<br /> 8) <i>The Bucket List</i> - $4,100,000<br /> 9) <i>Hannah Montana</i> - $3,200,000<br /> 10) <i>27 Dresses</i> - $3,100,000<br /> <sub>(<em>Photo  20th Century Fox</em>)</sub><br /><br /><br /> <b>George Romero Returns to the World of Zombies</b><br /> <img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/175576.jpg" />George A Romero will always be known as the filmmaker with an affection for  some may even call it an obsession with  zombies. It definitely wasnt what Romero had in mind when he began making movies, but he knows the undead will always be connected to his name. I'd love to be able to go in and pitch another kind of film and be taken seriously, but I'm generally not taken seriously, admitted Romero. If I were to walk in there with a little romantic comedy, they'd say, What? So that's a bit frustrating because you don't grow up wanting to be a horror filmmaker. You grow up wanting to be a filmmaker, and I wish I had a wider range. I tried early on to do several films that were not genre and nine people saw them, so I don't have the credentials in that regard. <strong>Read On...</strong><br /> <sub>(<em>Poster  The Weinstein Company</em>)</sub><br /><br /><br /> <b><em>The Spiderwick Chronicles</em> Movie Review</b><br /> <img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/175577.jpg" />Its not often a fantasy film aimed at the younger set is just as appealing to adults, but <em>The Spiderwick Chronicles</em> manages to capture that <em>E.T.</em>-ish/<em>Goonies</em> spirit and transcend generational boundaries. <em>The Spiderwick Chronicles</em> is not only good, clean fun, but also packs a surprisingly powerful emotional punch that makes it something really special. <strong>Read On...</strong><br /> <sub>(<em>Photo  Paramount Pictures</em>)</sub> <br /><br />Source: <a href="http://movies.about.com/b/2008/02/18/jack-black-remakes-movie-history-in-be-kind-rewind.htm">Jack Black Remakes Movie History in Be Kind Rewind</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/jack-black-remakes-movie-history-in-be-kind-rewind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christopher Lloyd Goes Back to the Future Again</title>
		<link>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/christopher-lloyd-goes-back-to-the-future-again/</link>
		<comments>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/christopher-lloyd-goes-back-to-the-future-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/christopher-lloyd-goes-back-to-the-future-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/175053.jpg" /></p> <p>Roads? Where we&#8217;re going we don&#8217;t need roads&#8230;<br /> <br />Christopher Lloyd has stepped back in front of the cameras, reprising the now classic role of Doc Brown from the Back to the Future trilogy. But sadly this film shoot was not for a fourth Back to the Future film. This time the mad time-traveling scientist makes an appearance in a new music video by Universal Motown recording artist O’neal McKnight Featuring Greg Nice.</p> <p>If my calculations are correct, the last time Lloyd appeared as Doc Brown was in 1992 for live-action segments of the Back to the Future animated series (Actually, I just remembered that Lloyd also returned as the famous Doc for a Back to the Future Slot Machine in Las Vegas).</p> <p><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/175054.jpg" /></p>  <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-8329788691483836"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250; google_ad_format = "300x250_as"; google_ad_type = "text"; //2007-02-24: slashplay google_ad_channel = "4460054747"; google_color_border = "FFFFFF"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_link = "00AAE0"; google_color_text = "4D4D4C"; google_color_url = "B3B3B3"; //-->    <p>The new music video, directed by &#8216;X&#8217;, features a bearded Christopher Lloyd as Doc Brown and an adventure involving the DeLorean time machine. McKnight goes back to the future with Doc Brown to get a glimpse into his life and relationship with a beautiful lady whom he meets while at a New York City dance club.</p> <p>No details on when the video will be released (or for that matter, where it will be played, since MTV no longer plays music videos, at least from what I gather). For now we’ll have to settle for a set of these photo stills, and a behind the scenes video which is available for your viewing pleasure on BTTF.com.</p> <p><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/175055.jpg" /></p> <p><strong>Discuss:</strong> Would you like to see a <em>Back to the Future 4</em>? Pitch me your story ideas!</p>       <strong><br /><br />Source: <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/slashfilm/~3/236809786/">Christopher Lloyd Goes Back to the Future Again</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/christopher-lloyd-goes-back-to-the-future-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toshiba to Dump HD DVD?</title>
		<link>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/toshiba-to-dump-hd-dvd/</link>
		<comments>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/toshiba-to-dump-hd-dvd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/toshiba-to-dump-hd-dvd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christopher Campbell<br />Filed under: Tech Stuff, Home Entertainment</p><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/175047.jpg" />Forget all those retailers and studios abandoning HD DVD. Here's the biggest domino to fall: Toshiba, which was surely the biggest and most important exclusive supporter from the beginning, releasing the first commercially available HD DVD player back in 2006. According to <em>The Hollywood Reporter</em>, the Japanese company is expected to discontinue production of HD DVD products, including players and other devices related to the format. Apparently, however, they will continue selling existing equipment and have only ceased development and manufacture of new HD DVD products. There has been no formal announcement, though, from Toshiba. The trade quotes a vp of marketing for Toshiba America as saying the company still believes HD DVD to be technologically the best high-def format (over Blu-Ray) for customers. The decision, if in fact true, comes on the heels of, and is surely an effect of, last month's news that Warner Bros. and then (maybe) Paramount were going Blu-ray exclusive and recent announcements from Netflix, Best Buy, Blockbuster and Wal-Mart that they would each stop renting and/or selling HD DVD discs (or in Best Buy's case, stop selling HD DVD players yet continue selling the discs, but push/recommend Blu-Ray as the favored format) within the year. <br /><br /><em>The Hollywood Reporter </em>details some of the more recent HD DVD history, including Toshiba's desperate moves to stay in the game after Warner's abandonment. The company significantly cut the cost of their players, but still Blu-ray was the champion in the market. Additionally, new Blu-ray movie titles are constantly out-selling new HD DVD movie titles. The trade mentions that Toshiba's "last ditch effort" was a TV commercial that ran during the Super Bowl and which cost the company $2.7 million. Now all eyes are on the few HD DVD supporters that are left: Microsoft; Universal; DreamWorks and Paramount. How long before they all admit defeat? Within the week?<br /><br />Anyway, despite the impending death of HD DVD, this may be best time to get yourself an HD DVD player. Sure, it will be obsolete soon, but if you can find a good enough deal, it will be worth it. There are almost 400 movies available on HD DVD in the U.S., and all those disc are reportedly really cheap now, too. So, buy the player and some of your favorite movies and watch them. You can still go Blu-ray now or in the future, as well. But don't think of HD DVD as simply the new Beta. Supposedly it's actually a really great format, despite its lack of favor.<p><strong>Tags:</strong> Blu-ray, cinematical, HD DVD, HdDvd, toshiba</p><!-- google_ad_section_end --><br /><br />Source: <a href="http://feeds.cinematical.com/~r/weblogsinc/cinematical/~3/236283442/">Toshiba to Dump HD DVD?</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/toshiba-to-dump-hd-dvd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m Finished</title>
		<link>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/im-finished/</link>
		<comments>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/im-finished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/im-finished/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> ...with the exhaustive annual nominations that the Film Experience doles out each January and February. This year took me a bit longer than usual for whatever reason. Oops. I do this huge collection partly for you but I also do it for me. I like to catalogue... and I like to think of it as a scrapbook of memories from each film year. And of course I hope that people are using them for rental ideas after the fact.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/174932.jpg" /><br />The nominations are the fun part for me. The medals are even more excruciating and there isn't one year past that I don't wish I could go back and change things --I'll announce them Thursday I guess. But each year is a time capsule for how I felt right then. And here is the time capsule, complete, for how I feel now.<br /><br />Page 1 Picture, Director Screenplays<br />Page 2 Acting, Lead and Supporting<br />Page 3 Technicals (cinematography, etcetera<br />Page 4 Technicals (original score, etcetera) and here ends my "Oscar ballot" if you will...<br />the extras<br />Page 5 Line Readings, Cameos, Ensembles, etcetera<br />Page 6 Divas, Villains, Heroes<br />Page 7 Musical Moments, Action Sequences<br />Page 8 Openings, Endings, Credits, and the statistics...<br />Page 9 Mash-ups and Readers Polls (this page still in progress -voting ends at midnight on Thursday 02/21)<br /><br />Source: <a href="http://filmexperience.blogspot.com/2008/02/im-finished.html">I'm Finished</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/18/im-finished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sly Stallone Set for Another &#8216;Cliffhanger&#8217; Flick</title>
		<link>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/sly-stallone-set-for-another-cliffhanger-flick/</link>
		<comments>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/sly-stallone-set-for-another-cliffhanger-flick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/sly-stallone-set-for-another-cliffhanger-flick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erik Davis<br />Filed under: Action, Casting, Fandom, DIY/Filmmaking, Remakes and Sequels</p><p><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/174759.jpg" />He's resurrected Rocky. He brought back Rambo. And now Sylvester Stallone might be continuing the trend by reprising his role as rock climber Gabe Walker for another <em>Cliffhanger</em> film. Remember that one? Stallone plays a rock climber who accidentally drops his best friend's gal off a mountain, then returns to stop John Lithgow from stealing a bunch of money? It's a pretty good film -- and anytime you have Lithgow play the villain, you won't go wrong. According to PR Insider, "Sony executives are in negotiations with Stallone to revive the character for <em>The Dam</em>." </p> <p>Uh oh, does that mean there will be lots of water involved this time? Stallone first played the character back in 1993, and the film did pretty well at the box office (I believe it came in at somewhere in the $85 million range). One imagines Stallone will be the only one returning for <em>The Dam</em>, and his Gabe Walker character will be up against a new enemy. Here's my question: How many characters is Stallone going to revive before enough is enough? It's an odd trend; one that's making him money, sure, but Gabe Walker is no John Rambo or Rocky Balboa. What do you think about another <em>Cliffhanger</em> flick? Good idea, or should Sly stick with something a tad more original his next time out?</p><!-- google_ad_section_end --><br /><br />Source: <a href="http://feeds.cinematical.com/~r/weblogsinc/cinematical/~3/236147196/">Sly Stallone Set for Another 'Cliffhanger' Flick</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/sly-stallone-set-for-another-cliffhanger-flick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Can&#8217;t Wait #6 Doubt</title>
		<link>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/we-cant-wait-6-doubt/</link>
		<comments>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/we-cant-wait-6-doubt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/we-cant-wait-6-doubt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> <img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/174441.jpg" />Directed by John Patrick Shanley (Joe Vs. the Volcano / writer of Moonstruck)<br />Starring Streep, Hoffman, Adams and Davis<br />Based on the stage play of the same name (a veritable magnet for trophies and acclaim) written by Shanley, which tells the "parable" of a nun in 1964 who confronts a priest who she believes in sexually molesting a young black boy<br />Brought to you by Miramax<br />Expected Release Date December 5th, 2008<br /><br />Nathaniel: I'm going to let Gabriel, our resident theater guru kick us off here. Tell the kiddies why they ought to be excited about Doubt and how many prizes (a year before the Oscar noms have been tallied) that it's already picked up.<br /><br />Gabriel: I live but to serve you, Nathaniel.   Doubt  already has Tony, Pulitzer, Drama League, Drama Desk, OBIE, New York Critics Circle and Outer Critics Circle awards stacked on its shelf; it is arguably the most heralded new American play of the last five years. (August: Osage County might change all of that this season, but that's a completely different article, isn't it?) It proved remarkably successful on the road in 2006, where plays usually falter (as opposed to musicals).<br /><br /><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/174442.jpg" />But that's the not the important part of the story, is it? What makes Doubt, the play, so special is its gripping battle between rumor and truth, good and evil, sex and religion. Although it is set in 1964, it strikes many people as a morality tale for our gossip-inflected times. It is suspenseful and powerful, but wholly accessible...very few people will see it without finding something to relate to.<br /><br />The movie, which is written and directed by Oscar winner John Patrick Shanley (Moonstruck), also has the 2008 Dream Cast: Meryl Streep as the severe Sister Aloysius, Philip Seymour Hoffman as the conflicted Father Flynn, Amy Adams as the acolyte Sister James, and Tony winner Viola Davis as Mrs. Muller. These were the only characters in the play, but more have been added in the screenplay, including the central role of Jimmy. Who DOESN'T want to see Streep and Hoffman go toe-to-toe? The mind reels at the actor nirvana this film could attain...<br /><br />Glenn: I had never heard much about Doubt apart from the general stuff from people like Nathaniel - American plays don't tend to get Australian productions and as far as I know this one never did - but you know what movie title went ringin' through my mind while reading Gabriel's exciting description? Atonement  --a movie about moral guilt and the power of rumour? Does Keira show up in a sultry green habit citing rapid-fire British clipped dialogue?<br /><br />Apart from the obvious, I'm incredibly excited to be able to see Viola Davis is an <em>actual</em> featured role again. Nat has already discussed this ad nauseam, but why isn't she a bigger film star yet? Why isn't she being offered vaguely racist roles on primetime soap operas? Hmmm...<br /><br /><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/174443.jpg" />Viola Davis, left (Far From Heaven, Solaris) will play the mother of the allegedly abused child. Amy Adams, right (Enchanted, Junebug) the acolyte nun<br /><br />Joe: It was a shrewd move on the film's part to cast Meryl Streep in the lead -- the one actress who could get me to shut up about how much I'd want to see Cherry Jones reprise her role from the Broadway production (which I never got to see). I won't pretend like I'm not worried about the words "Philip Seymour Hoffman" and "theatrical adaptation" in the same sentence -- I've been liking him much better in recent years, but when he goes over-the-top theatrical, he loses me. Also, in terms of managing expectations, if you're looking for the Atonement-style early frontrunner which gets punished for being seen as such, it's either this or Revolutionary Road. I don't know how you go about combatting that perception, but someone's going to have to try.<br /><br />Gabriel: Joe's absolutely right...for film buffs who may not know Cherry Jones (M. Night Shyamalan films, the upcoming female president on 24), she's the queen of serious Broadway, one of the most talented (and may I add, nicest to have a drink with) actresses alive today. No one but Streep could take the part from her in a way I'd feel comfortable.<br /><br />And to quiet your fears about "theatrical adaptation" somewhat, Joe...the major criticism the play had when it was on Broadway, if any, was that is seemed too cinematic. I thought it reminded me of an HBO telefilm (which is where, honestly, I thought the adaptation would end up, like Angels in America). So the piece kind of naturally lends itself to this kind of styling. One hopes.<br /><br /><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/174444.png" />Nathaniel: Curious. I wasn't quite as excited as the rest of the planet when this hit Broadway but I do think it's a corker of a play. Yet I didn't feel like it was cinematic. It's the type of talky intense thing (all one set) that benefits from the stage and how you have to dive into the ideas of the story because there's no escape from it... It definitely builds as you see the power rising (Streep subbing for the altogether magnificent Cherry Jones --can they give her at least a nun cameo? Oh the humanity) and the parallel stakes rising for this other life (Hoffman)<br /><br />I hope the movie, which I know will try to "open it up" doesn't go to naturalistic. The play benefits from how little we see of the central mystery and how much it stays only in our heads. I fear that the movies being an indexical artform rather than representational one might topple this particular cart. But whether it can ride the transfer smoothly or awkwardly, I can't wait to see it.<br /><br />MaryAnn: I'm hugely curious to see how this gets adapted to film. (I also dread and simultaneously anticipate  Frost/Nixon ) I haven't seen the play but I have read it, and it doesn't seem very cinematic to me.<br /><br />On the plus side, Hollywood seems to have discovered the Bronx: this is one of several movies that are filming or have been shot in my neck of the woods recently. I'm looking forward to that, at least.<br /><br />Oh, but Atonement this ain't...<br /><br />previous<br />#7 The Curious Case of Benjamin Button / #8 <em>Revolutionary Road  / </em>#9 <em>The Dark Knight</em> / #10 Sex &#38; The City: The Movie / #11 The Lovely Bones / #12 Wall-E / #13 Stop-Loss / #14 The Women / #15 Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince / Introduction / Orphans<br />*<br /><br />Source: <a href="http://filmexperience.blogspot.com/2008/02/we-cant-wait-6-doubt.html">We Can't Wait #6 Doubt</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/we-cant-wait-6-doubt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clip From Spike Jonze’s Where the Wild Things Are…But Is It Real?</title>
		<link>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/clip-from-spike-jonze%e2%80%99s-where-the-wild-things-are%e2%80%a6but-is-it-real/</link>
		<comments>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/clip-from-spike-jonze%e2%80%99s-where-the-wild-things-are%e2%80%a6but-is-it-real/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/clip-from-spike-jonze%e2%80%99s-where-the-wild-things-are%e2%80%a6but-is-it-real/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/174334.jpg" /></p> <p>I was just about to go drown myself in Pabst and orange juice when a tipster sent me an email with the words &#8220;Hunter, What Do You Think?&#8221; and a link to the following vid. I can&#8217;t believe what I just watched. It appears to be a clip from <strong>Spike Jonze</strong>&#8217;s <strong><em>Where the Wild Things Are</em></strong>, and while the visual effects for the Wild Thing&#8217;s face are off, as is the voice work (think<em> Showbiz Pizza: The Movie</em>), this would go along with the reasons we&#8217;ve heard for the film being pushed back to 2009. As for the child actor playing the character of Max in the clip, is this the same young actor, <strong>Max Records</strong> (real name), that we&#8217;ve seen in the official still from the film? It&#8217;s hard to say, but my gang of Gchatters from coast to coast, including Peter, say it doesn&#8217;t look like him. I agree.</p> <p></p> <p>&#160;</p> <p><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/174335.jpg" /></p> <p>So, is the clip a fake? And if so, who would make such a precise fake, clearly as an inside joke, as there is little doubt that most of this was shot on film? A friend in New York says he heard last night that The Kid America Club, a ragtag group of New York hipster party animals who utilize similar wild thing-ish costumes and have considerable resources, may be behind this. <em>What the hell?</em> I don&#8217;t buy it, but if it&#8217;s fake, those maniacal hipsters are prime suspects as they knowingly operate in the same concentric circles as Jonze (and purportedly had talks with Showtime for their own show a few years ago).</p>  <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-8329788691483836"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250; google_ad_format = "300x250_as"; google_ad_type = "text"; //2007-02-24: slashplay google_ad_channel = "4460054747"; google_color_border = "FFFFFF"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_link = "00AAE0"; google_color_text = "4D4D4C"; google_color_url = "B3B3B3"; //-->    <p>The clip has a voyeuristic, sun-spotted quality and there is an inherent weirdness present that would go along with what sneak preview audiences have reported. The first few seconds even contain music that sounds like it&#8217;s taken from Beck&#8217;s <em>Odelay</em>, another Jonze bud. I am at once bothered by how unfinished this is and totally digging it. Throw some Karen O on the creative pyre, and I&#8217;m beginning to think that Jonze and <strong>Dave Eggers</strong>, who wrote the screenplay, may have quite a bit of deranged magic in store for us, much to Hollywood&#8217;s chagrin. And after <em>There Will Be Blood</em>, this is the only children&#8217;s movie suitable for <strong>Paul Dano</strong>.</p> <p>But if this clip is ersatz: <strong>Greatest Hipster Prank of All Time! </strong></p>       <strong><br /><br />Source: <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/slashfilm/~3/236300244/">Clip From Spike Jonze’s Where the Wild Things Are…But Is It Real?</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/clip-from-spike-jonze%e2%80%99s-where-the-wild-things-are%e2%80%a6but-is-it-real/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Director Carter Smith Talks Ending, Sequel to The Ruins and Troll</title>
		<link>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/director-carter-smith-talks-ending-sequel-to-the-ruins-and-troll/</link>
		<comments>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/director-carter-smith-talks-ending-sequel-to-the-ruins-and-troll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/director-carter-smith-talks-ending-sequel-to-the-ruins-and-troll/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/174330.jpg" /></p> <p>In going along with Peter&#8217;s &#8220;rant&#8221; about what constitutes a spoiler on the Internets, I&#8217;m not sure if the following quote from director <strong>Carter Smith</strong> about <strong><em>The Ruins</em></strong> is one or not. If you&#8217;ve read the book by Scott Smith, it&#8217;s definitely not, and the info should please you. But if you haven&#8217;t, you&#8217;ll know what&#8217;s in store to a certain degree this April if you see the post-college dread horror thriller set in Mexico starring <strong>Jena Malone</strong>. With that out of the way, Smith tells Bloody Disgusting he doesn&#8217;t see a sequel in the cards&#8230;</p> <blockquote><p><font><font> &#8220;I haven&#8217;t talked at all about a sequel [to <em>The Ruins</em>],&#8221; says Smith. &#8220;Audiences are so jaded these days that they just assume it&#8217;s set up for a sequel, while the ending you saw was about keeping the integrity of the darkness,&#8221; he explains. &#8220;That was what I loved about the book was that it was so bleak and dark&#8230; I couldn&#8217;t believe it ended the way it did, it took me by surprise.&#8221;</font></font></p></blockquote>  <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-8329788691483836"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250; google_ad_format = "300x250_as"; google_ad_type = "text"; //2007-02-24: slashplay google_ad_channel = "4460054747"; google_color_border = "FFFFFF"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_link = "00AAE0"; google_color_text = "4D4D4C"; google_color_url = "B3B3B3"; //-->    <p>See, to me, I&#8217;d rather not know if a film&#8217;s ending is the opposite of a walk into the sunset before I see it. You? And if the ending leaves ambiguity for a sequel, even more so. Such endings are a turn-off to me. I&#8217;m curious to see if <em>The Ruins</em> connects, as a sort of mid-brow <em>Touristas</em>, but either way, it seems Smith won&#8217;t have difficulty with a creative follow-up, mentioning <strong><em>Troll</em></strong> (apparently <em>not</em> a remake of the 1986 cult flick and unrelated to this same-named 2009 film) and <strong><em>Come Closer</em></strong> as his candidates.</p> <blockquote><p><font><font>&#8220;There are a couple projects I&#8217;m working, a adaptation of a book called <em>Come Closer</em>, by Sara Gran,&#8221; he continues, &#8220;[It&#8217;s] the story of a New York women who becomes convinced she might be possessed by a demon. Then there&#8217;s a book that I adapted into a screenplay called <em>Troll</em>, [which is] a very adult fairy tale. [It&#8217;s] Strange dark cross between <em>E.T.</em> and <em>Lolita</em>.&#8221; </font></font></p></blockquote> <p>Wow. I&#8217;m on Team <em>Troll</em>, there is no doubt.</p>       <strong><br /><br />Source: <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/slashfilm/~3/236200762/">Director Carter Smith Talks Ending, Sequel to The Ruins and Troll</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/director-carter-smith-talks-ending-sequel-to-the-ruins-and-troll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Box Office: Jumper $8.2M; Step-Up 2 $6.2M; Spiderwick $4.7M</title>
		<link>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/friday-box-office-jumper-82m-step-up-2-62m-spiderwick-47m/</link>
		<comments>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/friday-box-office-jumper-82m-step-up-2-62m-spiderwick-47m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/friday-box-office-jumper-82m-step-up-2-62m-spiderwick-47m/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://filmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/173770.jpg" /></p> <p>Jumper has leapt to an excellent $8.21M on Friday, and it should bound to a solid $34.47M for the Valentine’s Day through President’s Day 5-day box office frame. After finishing in a virtual dead heat with Disney’s Step Up to the Streets on Thursday, Doug Liman’s sci-fi adventure pic overwhelmed the competition on Friday. Meanwhile, Step Up 2 received a slight Thursday-to-Friday bump dancing to a $6.25M 2nd day. The low budget sequel to the 2006 surprise hit should reach $28.45M for the 5-day for an anticipated weekend-best PTA of $11,518 per location.</p> <p>The Spiderwick Chronicles (Paramount), the well-reviewed family fantasy movie at over 3,800 locations, has recovered from a disappointing Thursday, collecting an estimated $4.75M on Friday. Directed by Mark Waters (Freaky Friday, Mean Girls), and checking in with a reported budget of $100M+, Spiderwick will have banked $25.35M or so by Monday night. That’s well short of the $28.53M that 2007’s Bridge to Terabithia (Disney) delivered in 4 days last President’s weekend.</p> <p>Romantic comedy holdover Fool’s Gold (Warner Bros) out-paced Universal’s Definitely Maybe in the date movie chase on Friday $3.9M-$2.9M. The Matthew McConaughey/Kate Hudson flick should wind up the weekend with an estimated $18.75M for a new cume of $45.3M. Definitely Maybe, starring Ryan Reynolds, will manage only a 5th-place finish with a disappointing $14.4M over the 5 day period.<br /> <br /> In Bruge (Focus) is proving to be a potent specialty film, expanding to 112 locations while maintaining a $2,377 PTA Friday. The Colin Farrell/Ralph Fiennes black comedy is headed for a $1.24M 5-day and a likely $11,000+ PTA.</p>  <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-8329788691483836"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250; google_ad_format = "300x250_as"; google_ad_type = "text"; //2007-02-24: slashplay google_ad_channel = "4460054747"; google_color_border = "FFFFFF"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_link = "00AAE0"; google_color_text = "4D4D4C"; google_color_url = "B3B3B3"; //-->    <p>Among other specialty releases, George A. Romero’s Diary of the Dead (Weinstein/MGM) had a so-so opening with $1,840 per on 42 screens. The genre film will scare up about $245,000 in its first 4 days of release.</p> <p>EXCLUSIVE FANTASY MOGULS EARLY FRIDAY ESTIMATES<br /> 1. Jumper (Fox) - $8.21M - $2,396 PTA - $14.84M cume<br /> 2. Step Up 2 the Streets (Disney) - $6.25M - $2,530 PTA - $12.85M cume<br /> 3. The Spiderwick Chronicles (Paramount) - $4.75M - $1,235 PTA - $7.05M cume<br /> 4. Fool&#8217;s Gold (Warner Bros) -$3.9M - $1,248 PTA - $32.8M cume<br /> 5. Definitely Maybe (Universal) - $2.9M - $1,316 PTA - $6.01M cume<br /> 6. Welcome Back, Roscoe Jenkins (Universal) - $2.17M - $910 PTA - $22.4M cume<br /> 7. Juno (Fox Searchlight) - $1.31M - $607 PTA - $120.5M cume<br /> 8. The Bucket List (Warner Bros) - $1.02M - $444 PTA - $78M cume<br /> 9. The Eye (Lionsgate) - $850,000 - $399 PTA - $23.9M cume<br /> 10. 27 Dresses (Fox) - $840,000 - $434 PTA - $67.6M cume<br /> 11. Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds (Disney) - $775,000 - $1,131 PTA - $55.9M cume<br /> 12. There Will Be Blood (Paramount Vantage) - $700,000 - $496 PTA - $28.6M cume<br /> *In Bruge (Focus) – $270,000 - $2,377 PTA - $882,000 cume<br /> *George A. Romero&#8217;s Diary of the Dead (Weinstein Company/MGM) - $78,000 - $1,840 PTA - $78,000 cume<br /> *Tout est parfait [Everything is Fine] (Alliance Films) - $30,000 - $1,168 PTA - $30,000<br /> *The Band&#8217;s Visit (Sony Classics) - $17,000 - $2,122 PTA - $110,000 cume<br /> *The Year My Parents Went on Vacation (City Lights) - $12,000 - $660 PTA - $12,000 cume</p> <p>EXCLUSIVE FANTASY MOGULS EARLY 5-DAY ESTIMATES<br /> 1. Jumper (Fox) - $34.47M - $10,057 PTA - $34.47M cume<br /> 2. Step Up 2 the Streets (Disney) - $28.45M - $11,518 PTA - $28.45M cume<br /> 3. The Spiderwick Chronicles (Paramount) - $25.35M - $6,590 PTA - $25.35M cume<br /> 4. Fool&#8217;s Gold (Warner Bros) -$18.75M - $6,000 PTA - $45.3M cume<br /> 5. Definitely Maybe (Universal) - $14.4M - $6,534 PTA - $14.4M cume<br /> 6. Welcome Back, Roscoe Jenkins (Universal) - $11.29M - $4,733 PTA - $29.5M cume<br /> 7. Juno (Fox Searchlight) - $5.56M - $2,984 PTA - $124.2M cume<br /> 8. The Bucket List (Warner Bros) - $4.99M - $2,163 PTA - $81.1M cume<br /> 9. Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds (Disney) - $4.58M - $6,688 PTA - $59.1M cume<br /> 10. 27 Dresses (Fox) - $4.19M - $2,165 PTA - $70.3M cume<br /> 11. There Will Be Blood (Paramount Vantage) - $3.55M - $2,524 PTA - $31.1M cume<br /> 12. The Eye (Lionsgate) - $3.51M - $1,653 PTA - $25.9M cume<br /> *In Bruge (Focus) – $1.24M - $11,146 PTA - $1.85M cume<br /> *George A. Romero&#8217;s Diary of the Dead (Weinstein Company/MGM) - $245,000 - $5,833 PTA - $245,000 cume<br /> *Tout est parfait [Everything is Fine] (Alliance Films) - $150,000 - $5,769 PTA - $150,000 cume<br /> *The Band&#8217;s Visit (Sony Classics) - $85,000 -$10,625 PTA - $178,000 cume<br /> *The Year My Parents Went on Vacation (City Lights) - $60,000 - $3,333 PTA - $60,000 cume</p> <p>Read More at Fantasy Moguls.</p>       <strong><br /><br />Source: <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/slashfilm/~3/236045076/">Friday Box Office: Jumper $8.2M; Step-Up 2 $6.2M; Spiderwick $4.7M</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://filmwblog.com/2008/02/17/friday-box-office-jumper-82m-step-up-2-62m-spiderwick-47m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
